Categories
Coaching Hockey Personal

Drew’s Rules of Coaching

This is a post that has been a long time in the making. As a hockey coach, I’ve had an informal set of “rules” that I’ve used to guide myself as both an assistant and coach. At the suggestion of a friend of mine, I’ve finally decided to put everything down. I’ll run down a summary of the rules and then expand on them individually. The rules can be summarized as:

  1. Never handle money
  2. Do unto other coaches as you would want them to do unto you
  3. Coaches shouldn’t outnumber players on the bench
  4. Don’t be afraid to look silly
  5. Worry about the recovery, not the mistake
  6. I’m the only one who gets to beak off to the refs
  7. If it ain’t worth a 3-game suspension, it ain’t worth a 2-minute penalty
  8. Politics suck
  9. Unless you’ve played the position, don’t mess with a goalie’s game
  10. If you have to puke, do it on the opposition’s bench

1. Money

This is my number one rule. With all the other responsibilities involved in running a team, handling money is best left to the Team Manager or Treasurer. People can get very funny about money and are quick to focus their anger if something seems amiss (even if it actually isn’t) so it is best to avoid any hassle in the first place.

2. Other Coaches

This rule can also be stated as: “Stay out of other coach’s kitchens if you expect them to stay out of yours”. In my opinion, this should also be the “golden” rule for all coaches. Every coach has their own way of running things. They have their own habits, tendencies, idiosyncrasies, and rules. They like their teams “just so” and they have reasons for that. I know I do, so the last thing I want is someone meddling (even if their intentions are good) on the team(s) I coach because they have a different way of doing things. As a coach, I therefore shouldn’t voice an unsolicited opinion to, or attempt to meddle in, another coach’s team.

As an assistant coach, I need to fully support the goals and direction the head coach sets for the team. If I can’t, I should step away rather than undermine things. A good example was when I was an assistant coach on a bantam team. A parent had issues with the way the head coach ran the team and this parent was not satisfied with the discussions they’d had with the coach. This parent had tried to talk me into agreeing with their point of view. I had no problem with the coach’s decisions and felt that they were reasonable under the circumstances so I simply told the parent that it was the head coach’s call and that any issues should be taken up with the coach or the board. That being said, if I felt that the coach had crossed a line, I would have taken it up with them or the board.

Corollary: I would much rather have no assistant coaches rather than people who are well meaning but aren’t on the same page as me.

3. Don’t Outnumber Your Players

This rule seems a little silly, but these are my rules so that’s ok. There is no point in having 5 coaches when you only have 4 players on the bench. There is only so much coaching that can be done at any one time so why not let one or more of the assistant coaches head up to the bar, or at the very least, get under the heaters in the stands?

4. Pride Goeth Before a Fall

Never be afraid to look a little silly. Pride and a desire to maintain control can make one look inflexible. I like to think I can laugh at myself and be comfortable with my players laughing at me, even just a little bit. I think it makes me a far more effective coach and may just allow me to make a better connection with my players. That being said, there is a line I draw between being laughed at because I did something silly, and being disrespected.

Corollary #1: Be prepared to admit to your mistakes. I make plenty of them and if I want to hold my players accountable, I need to make sure I am accountable to myself as well.

Corollary #2: I’m not against being on the receiving end of a practical joke now and again so as long as it is funny and non-destructive. My skates, glove, stick, car, and hat are all off limits though!

5. Mistakes

Mistakes aren’t all that important; recovery from the mistakes is what is most important. This rule is as much for me as a coach as it is for my players. One should never be afraid to do something because they might make a mistake. Once I’ve made a mistake, it’s done. I can’t go back and undo it so I just have to figure out how to do my best to recover from it. As a coach, my team needs me to focus on the recovery in the now so they can recover as a unit. Part of the recovery, of course, is figuring out what the mistake was and determining how to avoid it in the future.

Corollary: Try to make sure that you never make the same mistake twice; mistakes happen but try to make sure each one is a novel one. It’s more fun that way!

6. Beaking Off

I am usually in a position where I will be the one who will be held responsible for my team’s conduct towards the officials, therefore I am the only one who is allowed to beak off at them. Yelling at a referee never helps in the moment and can never benefit me in the long run, so why risk making things worse for the team? The calls the officials make or don’t make are out of my control so I can’t let myself lose focus on the parts of the game that I can control. I always strive to make my players and assistant coaches understand this. That being said, I believe that there may be the very rare occasion where you have to stand up for your team and confront officials, if only to bring your team together. This is one of those things that I’m constantly working on. Most games, I’m good, but there are some games where the calls, or more often non-calls, get under my skin and I find it tough to re-focus. This is a mistake and as per the previous rule, the recovery is the important thing.

Corollary: Fume. Re-focus. Move on. Simple, right?

Observation: Coaches really have very few good role models for dealing with officials. Think of all the hockey coaches in the media. How many times do you see a coach screaming at, or confronting the officials? 5 times per game? 10? More? This is at the NHL level, the international level, the AHL level, and the junior hockey level. Never mind the videos floating around of is happening at the minor hockey level. Where are the role models? How are coaches supposed to see how to act if all we see are the ones on TV losing their marbles at every little thing the officials do?

7. What Is It Worth?

If it isn’t worth a 3-game suspension, it isn’t worth a 2-minute minor. That’s a mantra I use for myself and for my players. It’s simple, if some kind of dumb play or stupid comment is likely to result in a penalty call against me or the team, why is it worth it? Unless it is worth getting suspended over, and there are a few things that are, then don’t do it. No beaking off to the officials. No retaliating for that hook or slash. No biting when the other team tries to get under your skin.

8. Politics

Avoid politics. Period. I’m not too good at the whole politics thing and I’ve gotten burned whenever I’ve gotten involved. I just want to show up and coach my team. I’m not saying not to fight for the important stuff, but just avoid the political games people try to play. It isn’t worth the trouble.

9. Goalies

Nothing is more dangerous than a little bit of knowledge about a particular subject. This is especially true with goaltending these days. I’ve never seriously played the position (just enough times to know it isn’t for me) and so much of the current way of playing is very technical. Goaltending is critical to any team and the last thing you want to do is mess that up. If you have a goalie who has a set style and they don’t ask for your opinion, let them play their game.

I remember my first game as a head coach. I was all prepared with what I wanted to say to the captains, the wingers, the centres, and the defense, but I had no idea what to say to the goalie. I brought it up with my assistant coach, Greg, and asked him what I should say. He told me that he’d been coaching for 25 years and he knew exactly what to do. He led me over to our goalie, looked her square in the eyes, and said, “Stop the puck.” That’s been what I’ve gone with since that first game.

10. Wait… What?

Yes, it’s silly. It’s supposed to be silly. It also makes a lot of sense if you think about it.

“If you have to throw up, throw up on the opposition’s bench.”

Whenever I say it I always manage to get a laugh, or at least a bemused look, out of a player if they aren’t feeling too well. If I can make a player feel a little better (or less worse), my job is made that much easier.

quinn_pat640

Categories
Hockey Personal

NHL Playoffs – Round 1

My yearly tradition of predicting the NHL playoff results is continuing, albeit in an abbreviated form this year. I didn’t follow the NHL very much this season, so I’m just going to make my predictions for each round without any explanation. Maybe next year, I’ll follow things a bit more closely and have a better idea of where teams stand.

Western Conference:

Anaheim Ducks vs. Dallas Stars – Anaheim in 5

San Jose Sharks vs. Los Angeles Kings – Los Angeles in 6

Colorado Avalanche vs. Minnesota Wild – Colorado in 5

St. Louis Blues vs. Chicago Blackhawks – Chicago in 7

Eastern Conference:

Boston Bruins vs. Detroit Red Wings – Boston in 6

Tampa Bay Lightning vs. Montreal Canadiens – Montreal in 5

Pittsburgh Penguins vs. Columbus Blue Jackets – Pittsburgh in 4

New York Rangers vs. Philadelphia Flyers – Philadelphia in 6

yzerman

Categories
Hockey Personal

Stanley Cup Finals Prediction

Well, that was a brutal 3rd round for predictions.  Nobody picked Boston to sweep, including me.  All told, I’m 6/14 so I can’t even make it above .500 for this playoff season.

Chicago Blackhawks vs. Boston Bruins – BOS in 6

Boston looks nigh on unbeatable right now.  They way they made the Penguins look inept through most of the series was truly amazing.  That being said, Chicago is not Pittsburgh.  The ‘Hawks are probably almost as skilled but they possess a lot more grit than the Penguins.  In addition, they have shown a good ability to adapt their game, which was probably the biggest thing that hurt Pittsburgh.  They will definitely give the Bruins a run for their money but it won’t be enough.  Boston is too good defensively and they’ve got Conn Smythe level goaltending right now.  Unless they have a major breakdown in their end or get hit with key injuries, they will hoist their 2nd Stanley Cup in 3 years.

Categories
Hockey Personal

2nd Round Playoff Predictions

After an ABYSMAL first round of predictions, I’m on to the second round after going 3-for-8.

Eastern Conference

Pittsburgh Penguins vs. Ottawa Senators – PIT in 6

The Penguins need to count their lucky stars that they are playing in the second round. The Islanders gave them almost more than they could handle and if New York had better goaltending, we would be talking about who the Islanders would be facing. Pittsburgh is in tough this round, mainly due to the fact that the Islanders showed other teams how to play against them. Ottawa is getting healthy at the right time and if you mix in the Cooke-Karlson business, this series will definitely have a lot of emotion. The Sens were also a bit lucky getting past the banged-up Canadiens. Craig Anderson was the main reason for the Sens’ victory and look for him to be strong against the Penguins.  If they can solve Anderson, then Pittsburgh will have a fairly easy time of it. If they can’t, then the door is open for the Sens. Ultimately I don’t see that the Senators have enough firepower to go toe-to-toe. They will give it a good fight but Pittsburgh’s offense will carry the day.

Boston Bruins vs. New York Rangers – NYR in 6

Despite the fact that the Leafs totally collapsed in the last 10 minutes of game 7, they did make the Bruins look vulnerable.  Most of Boston’s scoring came from one line and in the playoffs, that is never a good thing to rely on. The Rangers, on the other hand, won their game 7 by having phenomenal goaltending.  They worked hard and made the Capitals have to force the issue which led to mistakes, which led to New York goals. If the Bruins cannot find additional scoring, I can’t see them outworking the Rangers, who will be willing to play a bang-and-crash style if need be. With the edge in goaltending going to New York, I see them taking it in 6 for the upset.

Western Conference

Los Angeles Kings vs. San Jose Sharks – LA in 5

The Kings-Blues series was one of the best I think I’ve ever seen.  The hockey was intense in every game and it was a shame that one team had to lose.  The series definitely could have gone 7 games, but fortunately for LA, it didn’t. The Sharks, on the other hand, played lacklustre hockey against a Canucks team that I had honestly expected to be stronger. Vancouver never looked dangerous for more than the odd player her and there and so the Sharks coasted to an easy victory over an easy team. LA will be anything but easy. I don’t think the Sharks will be ready to play a strong, physical team and they will find themselves in a hole very quickly. LA will pound the sharks into submission and their goaltending will give the Sharks fits. I won’t predict a sweep because San Jose does have good goaltending that could maybe steal them a game or two (although to be honest, it was never really tested in the Vancouver series), but it won’t be enough.

Chicago Blackhawks vs. Detroit Red Wings – CHI in 6

Isn’t it funny how a team that is too old, or missing too many key pieces, makes the playoffs for the 22nd year in a row and then knocks off a team that is tougher and faster than they are? The Red Wings surprised many by making the playoffs, but they showed a lot of grit and heart beating a tough Anaheim team. Chicago, on the other hand, just rolled against the Wild, continuing on the roll they started way back on game 1. My biggest concern with the Blackhawks is that they really haven’t faced much adversity this year.  If Detroit can steal a few games, will the Hawks be able to maintain their roll?  On paper, this series should be over quickly, but I just think the Wings will give them trouble. If Chicago can expose the Detroit defense then they will have success.  The bottom line is that Detroit will give it a go, but won’t have the legs or experience on the back-end to beat Chicago.

Categories
Hockey Personal

The NHL Lockout Is Over – Do I Really Care?

Despite my best efforts to avoid getting sucked into the media coverage of the NHL lockout over the past 4 months, I have inevitably been subjected to bits and pieces of news as I have perused my feeds in Google Reader. Last night before I went to bed, I did the usual once-over of my feeds just to catch up on the news of the day and strangely found myself with a bit less apathy towards this whole lockout mess. I actually read a few articles on the state of things and found myself thinking “Wow! They could actually solve this.”.

Just to back up a bit, I certainly wasn’t surprised that this whole mess actually happened. Greed will do what it will do and there was more than enough to go around between the owners and the players. I didn’t think I’d missed NHL hockey per se, but I did miss being able to see that kind of hockey. Having the ability to just throw on the game I love over dinner on a Tuesday night was something I enjoyed. Sure, there were a few CHL games on, but those were usually on Friday nights so it really didn’t scratch that mid-week hockey itch. Despite the fact that I coach several teams, there is a huge difference between coaching and sitting back and simply watching a game as a fan. I was definitely missing that. I’d managed to take in some of the Spengler cup games over the holidays, plus a few games of the World Juniors and enjoyed both, but they were both over too soon.

Returning to this lockout mess, I found it very strange that after nearly 4 months of feeling and saying “I don’t care”, “I hope they both lose”, and “I’m never going back”,  I was suddenly hopeful that there would be a season and I could get back to watching hockey. Logically I know that the NHL isn’t the only “game” in town when it comes to hockey but nothing else was really able to replace it. Much to my chagrin, I wasn’t really eager to have it replaced. Had I been completely taken in by the NHL’s marketing team, as well as that of their sponsors and corporate partners? Was it the high-definition broadcasts? The six zillion camera angles with the ultra slow motion replays? The “Captain Obvious” play-by-play announcers? The forced and often painful “insight” granted us by “experts” in between periods? Or was it that the whole kit-and-kaboodle was just what I had come to find entertaining (or simply comfortable)?

This morning I did my usual start-of-day crawl through the news and shock! There it was plastered everywhere that a deal had been reached. Oh Joy! Oh Rapture! There stood the two principals in this whole soap opera announcing that it was over, seemingly proud of themselves for conquering the inevitable. As I read the news and watched the accompanying, often painfully repetitive videos, all I could feel was this sense of ambivalence. Yes, I can once again go back to watching my hockey on Tuesday nights, get my fix of Ron and Don on CBC, and listen to the empty cliché responses of the players to the leading and softball questions of interviewers. Yes I can once again see spectacular displays of skill sprinkled amongst long stretches of mediocre hockey dominated by systems of play designed to all but eliminate those same displays of skill. Yes I can once again watch many of the “stars” of the game make half-hearted attempts in regular season games and then disappear in playoff games when it counts most.

Many fans will return immediately, and many more will trickle back in over the next few years. Too many of us grew up with it and it has become a very significant part of our lives. I know I will be back, but not because I strongly support the game or the teams or players. I will be back because it is comfortable, not because I really care. I’m not sure how many other fans will be back for the same reason, but Heaven forbid that the NHLPA or the owners ever make it feel uncomfortable for the fans again.

I had more to write about how I think the owners and NHLPA need to be represented by people who have actually played the game, but that is a whole other rant.

Updated:

I just read a quote from Buffalo Sabres goaltender, Ryan Miller: “I hope that fans will forgive us for the role we played in this lockout.” It is a nice sentiment, Ryan. My advice is that you the players need to give fans reasons to forgive you instead of just asking for it. Why don’t you make sure that for every game covered under this new CBA, every player brings 100% to every shift regardless of whether they are a star or a grinder? Why don’t you bury the hatchet with the owners right now and give everything you can to grow the game and repair the damage done? Why don’t you make sure that at the end of this CBA, the players are proactive and make a first, reasonable offer to ownership long before there can be any talk of another work stoppage? Do all of this and maybe the fans will forgive the players. As for the owners, that’s an entirely different matter.