Categories
Funny Personal Technical

Time Management

Some rather appropriate information on time management from Randall Monroe of XKCD fame.

Categories
Hockey Personal

Playoff Predictions 2011

Despite the fact that I’m not in any hockey pools this year, I decided to make my yearly predictions for the playoffs anyway.  Feel free to add your own predictions in the comments section.  The only rules are:

  1. Pick the winner
  2. Pick the number of games
  3. Give some kind of explanation why you think it will end up that way

Western Conference

Vancouver Canucks vs. Chicago Blackhawks

Normally I leave the Western Conference until last but I can’t help myself here.  The Canucks won the President’s Trophy for most points, had the most wins,  had the best Power Play, most goals for, least goals against, highest scorer, best goaltending tandem in the league, the number 3 Penalty Kill, and they were one of the best faceoff teams.  They displayed tremendous defensive depth, seemingly ignoring lengthy injuries to each of their top-6 defensemen.

The Hawks, last year’s cup champions are a shadow of their former selves, having backed into the playoffs on the last day of the season, being helped by a Dallas team that couldn’t win when it counted.

Sounds like we might as well be looking at the second round, shouldn’t it?  My answer is categorically “NO”.  Roberto Luongo has never really got it done in the playoffs and until he either single-handedly wins a series or two or carries the Canucks to the cup, his status as an elite goalie will always be in question.  With the loss of Manny Malholtra and the suspension of Raffi Torres, I worry about the offensive depth on that 3rd and 4th line.

From the Hawks’ perspective, I have to question their goaltending and offensive depth after their fantastic top two lines.  I also have to wonder if the Hawks are too tired from a long push after an even longer season last year.   Still, they do hold a bit of a mental edge, having handled Vancouver in each of the last two playoff seasons.

Prediction: Vancouver in 6 – too deep, too good, too strong

San Jose Sharks vs. Los Angeles Kings

Ah, San Jose, the perennial contenders/pretenders.  They didn’t finish first in the conference but they still have a good team.  Their goaltending is a big question mark, as is the annual playoff performance predictions for big Joe Thornton.  Are they deep enough for a good run?

The Kings are a different matter.  They have enough serious injuries to their forward corps that I am not sure they have the depth to compete.

Prediction: San Jose in 5 – LA just doesn’t have the horses

Detroit Red Wings vs. Phoenix Coyotes

Detroit has been at the apex of the hockey world for almost 20 years.  They have been accused of being too old and of having poor goaltending, but all they do is seem to win.  They are the measuring-stick that all organizations need to compare themselves to.  This year, they have been dogged by injures and yet they still managed to win their division.

The Coyotes have been playing well despite having the controversy of the sale swirling around them.  They have a top-notch goaltender in Ilya Bryzgalov and a solid defensive-corps.

Despite the advantage of experience and greater offensive depth, I don’t think the Wings have what it takes this year.

Prediction: Phoenix in 7 – Just a feeling that this will be an upset

Anaheim Ducks vs. Nashville Predators

Anaheim has the only 50-goal scorer in the league this year as well as a re-vitalized Teemu Selanne.  They have the experience and a whole lot of talent.  Their weak spot would be in goal with health question surrounding Hiller and Emery.

The Nashville Predators are a coherent, hard-working group with phenomenal goaltending in Pekka Rinne.  Their no-name offense is a concern but they can get the job done.

Prediction: Nashville in 6 – Rinne will be too hard to get pucks behind

Eastern Conference

Washington Captials vs. New York Rangers

This is the new-look, defense-first Washington Capitals team.  They have the most dynamic player in the game who has bought into the system.  They have three goaltenders that they can go to, and an excellent supporting cast.  Ovechkin is rested and ready to go and their pride is smarting from losing to the Habs last year.

The Rangers are scrappy and have learned to work hard under John Tortorella .  They have an all-world goalie in Henrik Lundqvist and a lot of young talent.  I’m not sure about their offensive depth, however, and I don’t think their hard work will be enough.

Prediction: Washington in 6 – Too much firepower combined with better defensive play

Philadelphia Flyers vs. Buffalo Sabres

Philly was pushing for first for a while but stumbled down the stretch.  The loss of Chris Pronger seemed to hurt them and their goaltending seems to have gone south.  They are still a talented, physical team with a lot going for them, though.

Buffalo surged with the introduction of their new owner and they have an outstanding goalie in Ryan Miller.  Their offensive and defensive corps are relatively pedestrian, however, and they don’t have a lot of firepower.

Prediction: Phiadelphia in 5 – Buffalo can’t compete unless Miller wins every game for them single-handedly.

Boston Bruins vs. Montreal Canadiens

While this matchup will not have the same lustre of past series between these Original Six rivals, it will have all the passion and all of nastiness.  The Big Bad Bruins are back, ladies and gentlemen.  Lead by Zdeno Chara and Milan Lucic, Boston can manhandle almost any team in the league.  Tim Tomas’ record-setting season will guarantee him the Veznia trophy and he gives his team every opportunity to win each game.

Montreal is small but fast and Carey Price has had a great season.  While I think Price can steal a few games, the decimated defensive corps is a big concern.  The fact that their top players have struggled putting the puck in the net is also very troubling.  If they can lull Boston into a speed game, they have a chance, but if Boston forces this into a physical contest, Les Glorieux will lose and lose badly.

Prediction: Boston in 6 – Price gets a few games but isn’t able to stop the juggernaut.

Pittsburgh Penguins vs. Tampa Bay Lightning

Dan Bylsma deserves the Jack Adams trophy for what he’s done in Pittsburgh without his top two players.  Fleury has been outstanding and the team has made a real commitment to playing solidly in their own end.  The core of this team still has fresh memories of winning the cup two years ago and that will help them.  The question is, can they generate enough of the desperate play without Malkin, Crosby, and Matt Cooke (who is out for the first round)?

Tampa Bay has seen a great turnaround since Steve Yzerman took over as the GM.  Stamkos has flourished, flirting with the Art Ross and Maurice Richard trophy for most of the season.  They have Art Ross trophy runner-up, Martin St. Louis as well.  They are able to move the puck and generate offense.  The pickup of Dwayne Roloson was probably the best move made by the team.

Prediction: Tampa Bay in 6 – I don’t see the Penguins having the gas left in the tank after playing desperate hockey since January

Categories
Personal Politics

They came to their senses!

As a follow-up and update to my previous post, the CRTC (or whomever) has decided not to go ahead with the proposal to ease restrictions on broadcasting “false” news.

I can’t express how much of a relief this is.  The proposed loosening of the rules, which would have enabled broadcasters to air “false” news in cases where it did not cause direct harm, was a bad idea.

Categories
Personal Politics

What are they thinking?

I came across this post earlier today and it scares me.  The CRTC is proposing changing the rules and regulation regarding the broadcasting of false or misleading news and information.  In a nutshell, they want to relax the standards that are in place.  They wish to go from the current “shall not broadcast any false or misleading news” to a much more liberal “any news that the licensee knows is false or misleading and that endangers or is likely to endanger the lives, health or safety of the public“.

That is one heck of a leap and certainly something I don’t see as benefiting Canadian citizens in the long run.  I like to know that what I see and read in news broadcasts and in print is not purely infotainment, but is instead at least based on true facts and hopefully has been produced by some sort of journalistic standards.  It is far too easy to concoct falsehoods for which “harm” exists but is too difficult to actually measure.  I don’t know what could have possessed the government to think that this was a good idea, but they should seriously reconsider their position.

If you want to comment on the proposed change, please click here and click “submit” for item 2011-14.

Here is my submission:

To whom it may concern,
I strenuously object to the proposal to restrict the controls over the dissemination of false news stories. The ability to hold broadcasters accountable for the material they provide is essential for the public good. Content portrayed as being based on facts must be able to be held at face value in order to have an informed population capable of making decisions for themselves without undue influence of those with a greater position of power than themselves. This is especially critical in the area of political discourse, which I fear would be the primary source of potential abuse of these changes.
While it would be naive to assume that is possible to totally eliminate such imbalances of power, it must be the duty of the government to strive to minimize the impact of such situations. By lessening the standard to only prohibit that which could could cause “harm”, the CRTC is creating the potential for litigation nightmare. The definition(s) of harm are in some cases very ephemeral and while people could agree that harm was done, it would be virtually impossible to determine the level of harm done. This kind of situation would create an unacceptable grey area in Canadian Law.
Finally, I am very comforted by the fact that I can trust “news” is based on solid verifiable facts. I would very much like to continue enjoying the confidence of knowing that my news is believable.
I am unsure as to the origin of, and impetus for, the proposed changes, but if they have come from the current sitting government, I would like to respectfully remind the CRTC that the current ruling party is a minority government, and by very definition, does not represent the views of a large swath of Canadians. I would certainly hope that the appropriate members of the the parties of Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition have been consulted prior to bringing forth changes that could have a significant impact on Canada’s media landscape.
Respectfully,
Categories
Personal Technical

10 TED Commandments

A link from my friend, Brendon:

http://www.timlonghurst.com/blog/2008/05/16/the-ted-commandments-rules-every-speaker-needs-to-know/